Ori­gi­nal-Re­se­arch: Must­Grow Bio­lo­gics Corp. (by GBC AG): Ma­nage­ment in­ter­view

Re­se­arch | 19 Fe­bru­ar 2026 10:00

Ori­gi­nal-Re­se­arch: Must­Grow Bio­lo­gics Corp. – by GBC AG

19.02.2026 / 10:00 CET/CEST
Dis­se­mi­na­ti­on of a Re­se­arch, trans­mit­ted by EQS News – a ser­vice of EQS Group.
The is­suer is so­le­ly re­spon­si­ble for the con­tent of this re­se­arch. The re­sult of this re­se­arch does not con­sti­tu­te in­vest­ment ad­vice or an in­vi­ta­ti­on to con­clude cer­tain stock ex­ch­an­ge tran­sac­tions.


Clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on of GBC AG to Must­Grow Bio­lo­gics Corp.

Com­pa­ny Name: Must­Grow Bio­lo­gics Corp.
ISIN: CA62822A1030
Re­ason for the re­se­arch: Ma­nage­ment in­ter­view
Re­com­men­da­ti­on: Ma­nage­ment in­ter­view
Last ra­ting ch­an­ge:
Ana­lyst: Mat­thi­as Greif­fen­ber­ger, Cos­min Fil­ker

Com­mer­cia­li­zing Re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve Agri­cul­tu­re: MustGrow’s Mar­ket Op­por­tu­ni­ty and Stra­te­gic Ad­van­ta­ge

Agri­cul­tu­re is un­der­go­ing a struc­tu­ral trans­for­ma­ti­on. Re­gu­la­to­ry pres­su­re, sus­taina­bi­li­ty re­qui­re­ments, and the need to in­crease pro­duc­ti­vi­ty on fi­ni­te ara­ble land are ac­ce­le­ra­ting the shift toward bio­lo­gi­cal and re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve so­lu­ti­ons.

Against this back­drop, Must­Grow Bio­lo­gics Corp. is po­si­tio­ning its­elf at the in­ter­sec­tion of in­no­va­ti­on, sus­taina­bi­li­ty, and com­mer­cial agri­cul­tu­re. The com­pa­ny is de­ve­lo­ping and com­mer­cia­li­zing bio­lo­gi­cal tech­no­lo­gies de­si­gned to re­place or com­ple­ment syn­the­tic che­mi­cal and fer­ti­li­zer in­puts while ad­dres­sing a glo­bal mar­ket that is ra­pidly evol­ving.

This in­ter­view of­fers in­ves­tors a first op­por­tu­ni­ty to gain in­sight into MustGrow’s busi­ness, mar­ket po­si­tio­ning, and stra­te­gic di­rec­tion di­rect­ly from ma­nage­ment.

GBC AG: For in­ves­tors who are new to Must­Grow, how would you de­scri­be the company’s pur­po­se, core ac­ti­vi­ties, and the role it plays in mo­dern agri­cul­tu­re?

Corey Gi­as­son: Must­Grow is an agri­cul­tu­ral bio­tech­no­lo­gy com­pa­ny that pro­vi­des in­no­va­ti­ve bio­lo­gi­cal and re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve agri­cul­tu­re so­lu­ti­ons de­si­gned to sup­port sus­tainable far­ming. The Company’s pro­prie­ta­ry tech­no­lo­gy and pro­duct li­nes of­fer eco fri­end­ly al­ter­na­ti­ves to rest­ric­ted or ban­ned syn­the­tic che­mi­cals and fer­ti­li­zers.

Why are bio­lo­gics and re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve agri­cul­tu­re pro­ducts nee­ded? Far­mers around the world will need to grow more food to feed a gro­wing po­pu­la­ti­on, but how will they do this as more syn­the­tic che­mi­cals and fer­ti­li­zers are ban­ned or rest­ric­ted? Pests and di­se­a­ses will per­sist, and crops will still need pro­tec­tion. In ad­di­ti­on, re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve fer­ti­li­ty pro­ducts are re­qui­red to im­pro­ve soil he­alth, hel­ping ma­xi­mi­ze yields to meet in­cre­asing de­mand.

This macro in­vest­ment the­sis is il­lus­tra­ted in slide #4 of our Power­Point, see Fi­gu­re 1. 162 count­ries have ban­ned 460 pe­sti­ci­des. The­se pe­sti­ci­des and fer­ti­li­zers can be harmful to users, con­su­mers, and the en­vi­ron­ment. In some ca­ses, their use can also de­gra­de soil qua­li­ty. MustGrow’s tech­no­lo­gy is not only an al­ter­na­ti­ve to syn­the­tics, but an ef­fec­ti­ve one, which is ra­re­ly seen in the bio­lo­gi­cal space, see Fi­gu­re 2.

Many bio­lo­gics are not as ef­fec­ti­ve as syn­the­tic che­mi­cals. They can be like put­ting a band aid on a ga­ping wound. It will not stop the blee­ding. MustGrow’s tech­no­lo­gy, de­ri­ved from mus­tard seed and harnes­sing the na­tu­ral de­fen­se me­cha­nisms of the mus­tard plant, is de­si­gned to be as ef­fec­ti­ve as syn­the­tic che­mi­cals, see Fi­gu­re 2.

At the end of the day, far­mers need so­lu­ti­ons to help feed a gro­wing po­pu­la­ti­on, but they also want pro­ducts that are both ef­fec­ti­ve and safe for the soil and soil mi­cro­bio­me. That is what Must­Grow brings to the ta­ble, a na­tu­ral, or­ga­nic tech­no­lo­gy with the ef­fi­ca­cy of syn­the­tic che­mi­cals and fer­ti­li­zers, com­bi­ned with the safe­ty pro­fi­le of food gra­de ma­te­ri­als. This is why we be­lie­ve Bay­er has part­ne­red with us. They need ef­fec­ti­ve al­ter­na­ti­ves to syn­the­tics, and MustGrow’s pro­ducts and tech­no­lo­gies meet that need.

This tech­no­lo­gy can be ap­pli­ed across mul­ti­ple mar­kets, as re­flec­ted in our pro­duct pipe­line, which can be view­ed on our Tech­no­lo­gy page: https://​must​grow​.ca/​t​e​c​h​n​o​l​o​gy/

GBC AG: How lar­ge do you see the op­por­tu­ni­ty for bio­lo­gi­cal and re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve agri­cul­tu­re so­lu­ti­ons, and what macro, re­gu­la­to­ry, or sus­taina­bi­li­ty dri­ven trends are ac­ce­le­ra­ting ad­op­ti­on?

Corey Gi­as­son: It can be mas­si­ve. The Tech­no­lo­gy page high­lights the po­ten­ti­al size of mar­ket and los­ses (https://​must​grow​.ca/​t​e​c​h​n​o​l​o​gy/). Must­Grow will not be on all the acres, but just a small share of acres and we have a com­pa­ny ma­ker. This is also high­ligh­ted on the pipe­line page (#6) of the power­point (see Fi­gu­re 3).

If we look at Ter­ra­San­teTM bio­fer­ti­li­ty pro­duct for the US mar­ket alo­ne it could be a com­pa­ny ma­ker. The­re is 5.6 mil­li­on acres of high va­lue crops (fruit & ve­ge­ta­ble; tree nut & vine; root & tu­ber; and po­ta­toes) in the US alo­ne, which is what Must­Grow is curr­ent­ly tar­ge­ting for use of Ter­ra­San­teTM. At peak mar­ket pe­ne­tra­ti­on of say 3.3% (ba­sed on 1 application/acre/year) would equa­te to US$100 mil­li­on of re­ve­nues. Note that un­li­ke some syn­the­tic che­mi­cals and fer­ti­li­zers, MustGrow’s Ter­ra­San­teTM can be ap­pli­ed on an acre more than once per year. Gi­ven that some straw­ber­ry gro­wers in Ca­li­for­nia grow 2–4 crops/acre of straw­ber­ries every year (some let­tuce gro­wers 8–12 crops/acre/year), MustGrow’s ad­dressa­ble mar­ket could ac­tual­ly be much lar­ger than 5.6 mil­li­on acres of high va­lue crops sin­ce the US gro­wing con­di­ti­ons al­low for more than one crop/year to be grown on each acre.

GBC AG: Whe­re does Must­Grow fit wi­thin the broa­der agri­cul­tu­re and bio­lo­gics eco­sys­tem, and how should in­ves­tors think about your po­si­tio­ning re­la­ti­ve to tra­di­tio­nal che­mi­cal so­lu­ti­ons and ne­wer bio­lo­gi­cal play­ers?

Corey Gi­as­son: As il­lus­tra­ted abo­ve re­gar­ding Fi­gu­re 2, Must­Grow doesn’t feel that bio­lo­gi­cal so­lu­ti­ons are a com­pe­ti­tor to our tech­no­lo­gies and pro­ducts, be­cau­se they are not as ef­fec­ti­ve. The ef­fi­ca­cy of MustGrow’s tech­no­lo­gies and pro­ducts are com­pa­ra­ble to syn­the­tic che­mi­cals, but some of the­se syn­the­tics are be­ing ban­ned or de­re­gis­tered. As such, Must­Grow com­pe­ti­ti­on pres­su­res from syn­the­tics is low on con­ven­tio­nal acres…farmers need ef­fec­ti­ve al­ter­na­ti­ves and tho­se are hard to find. In ad­di­ti­on, from a pri­cing per­spec­ti­ve, MustGrow’s pro­ducts are pri­ce com­pe­ti­tively to syn­the­tics, which many bio­lo­gics are pri­ced at a pre­mi­um.

For or­ga­nic acres, the­re are li­mi­t­ed ef­fec­ti­ve so­lu­ti­ons to tre­at soil bor­ne di­se­a­se and pests.

At the end of the day, far­mers are go­ing to want to use so­me­thing that is ef­fec­ti­ve and not ch­an­ge their cur­rent sys­tems for ap­pli­ca­ti­on. We’re see­ing that now with US com­mer­cial far­mer ad­op­ti­on of our Ter­ra­San­te bio­fer­ti­li­ty pro­duct – our pro­duct is used seam­less­ly in cur­rent equip­ment sys­tems. In ad­di­ti­on to using an ef­fec­ti­ve pro­duct, they will be ex­ci­ted to use so­me­thing that builds up their soil. MustGrow’s pro­ducts and tech­no­lo­gy are cen­te­red on harnes­sing the na­tu­ral de­fen­se me­cha­nisms and or­ga­nic com­pounds found in mus­tard and for­mu­la­ting them into or­ga­nic bio­fer­ti­li­ty and bio­con­trol pro­ducts. The­se so­lu­ti­ons are de­si­gned to pro­tect soil he­alth and the soil mi­cro­bio­me, sup­port plant he­alth, and con­tri­bu­te to glo­bal food se­cu­ri­ty th­rough more sus­tainable agri­cul­tu­ral prac­ti­ces. All this com­bi­ned is what makes MustGrow’s pro­ducts and tech­no­lo­gies unique…they are na­tu­ral, or­ga­nic tech­no­lo­gies that are just as ef­fec­ti­ve, build up the soil, and a far­mer is not go­ing to have to pay more or ch­an­ge how they ap­p­ly (see Fi­gu­re 1).

GBC AG: At a high le­vel, how does Must­Grow crea­te va­lue across its plat­form, and how do pro­prie­ta­ry pro­ducts and stra­te­gic part­ner­ships sup­port this ap­proach?

Corey Gi­as­son: We are a tech­no­lo­gy com­pa­ny first and fo­re­most, and our tech­no­lo­gy (ap­pro­xi­m­ate­ly 110 pa­tents is­sued and pen­ding) pro­vi­des a so­lu­ti­on to a pro­blem far­mers are fa­cing worldwide…how are they go­ing to grow crops when some of the tools that they have used in the past (syn­the­tic che­mi­cals and fer­ti­li­zers) are be­ing ban­ned or rest­ric­ted for use. This pro­blem is go­ing to con­ti­nue to grow and ef­fec­ti­ve so­lu­ti­ons, such as MustGrow’s pro­ducts and tech­no­lo­gies, are not only nee­ded now, but we be­lie­ve are go­ing to be in­cre­asing­ly nee­ded even more in the fu­ture.

This has been va­li­da­ted th­rough our com­mer­cial part­ner­ship with Bay­er in Eu­ro­pe, the Midd­le East and Af­ri­ca. They wouldn’t have part­ne­red with us un­less the tech­no­lo­gy was ef­fec­ti­ve and the­re was a need for the tech­no­lo­gy in the mar­ket.

Se­cond­ly, our go to mar­ket stra­tegy is curr­ent­ly two-fold: wi­thin Ca­na­da and the US, Must­Grow is do­ing the work to get pro­duct re­gis­tra­ti­ons and will own the­se re­gis­tra­ti­ons, and out­side Ca­na­da and the US, we are part­ne­ring with the know­how and peo­p­le on the ground to get the pro­duct re­gis­tra­ti­ons. In the US, Must­Grow is ge­ne­ra­ting ac­ce­le­ra­ting sa­les on Ter­ra­San­teTM bio­fer­ti­li­ty pro­duct. Out­side of Ca­na­da and the US, Must­Grow has part­ne­red with Bay­er on Ter­raMGTM bio­con­trol pro­duct in Eu­ro­pe, the Midd­le East, and Af­ri­ca. For Bay­er in their ter­ri­to­ries, we esti­ma­te that they will be spen­ding US$35–40 mil­li­on to ge­ne­ra­te all the lo­cal data to get the pro­duct re­gis­tra­ti­ons. This is not so­me­thing that Must­Grow could do on its own. While Bay­er does this work, Must­Grow has and will po­ten­ti­al­ly be re­cei­ving up­front pay­ments, mi­le­stone pay­ments and even­tual­ly a royal­ty on Bayer’s sa­les of Ter­raMGTM.

In terms of pro­duc­tion, MustGrow’s cur­rent stra­tegy is to use con­tract ma­nu­fac­tures to pro­du­ce pro­duct. We have al­re­a­dy pro­du­ced pro­duct in Ca­na­da and Asia. Pro­duc­tion ca­pa­ci­ty of our ma­nu­fac­tu­ring part­ners is ex­pan­ding (they are in­ves­t­ing), which is gre­at as it will al­low for in­creased pro­duc­tion and no ca­pi­tal ex­pen­dit­ures from Must­Grow.

GBC AG: What are the key prio­ri­ties for the com­pa­ny over the near to me­di­um term as you con­ti­nue to build sca­le, mar­ket pre­sence, and com­mer­cial trac­tion?

Corey Gi­as­son: Sin­ce the end of 2024, Must­Grow has be­gun the tran­si­ti­on from R&D staged com­pa­ny to com­mer­cia­liza­ti­on. Sa­les of Ter­ra­San­teTM, star­ted in 2024 on only a small amount of acres (150 acres) as far­mers and re­tail­ers be­gan to test the pro­duct. With po­si­ti­ve re­sults, this con­tin­ued in 2025 on ap­pro­xi­m­ate­ly 1,000 acres. In ad­di­ti­on, we wit­nessed de­mand in­cre­asing en­ough that we ran out of pro­duct du­ring the se­cond half of 2025 as the in­iti­al sa­les ramp-up star­ted. Now, we are loo­king to ramp-up pro­duc­tion to meet in­creased de­mand.

Com­mer­cia­liza­ti­on is a key prio­ri­ty for Must­Grow. We want to con­ti­nue to dri­ve sa­les of Ter­ra­San­teTM in the exis­ting US mar­ket. In ad­di­ti­on, we want to ex­pand Ter­ra­San­teTM into other count­ries around the world that the pro­duct is ap­pli­ca­ble and can see fast track re­gis­tra­ti­on. This will dri­ve sa­les and even­tual­ly po­si­ti­ve cash flows for our com­pa­ny.

We con­ti­nue to in­tern­al­ly work on Ter­raMGTM bio­con­trol re­gis­tra­ti­ons in Ca­na­da and the US. Bay­er con­ti­nues to do its re­gis­tra­ti­on work in its ter­ri­to­ries at their cost (the EU be­ing the first).

We also will con­ti­nue to ge­ne­ra­te IP, though R&D work is be­ing a smal­ler share of our to­tal spend.

GBC AG: Loo­king ahead, what is your long term vi­si­on for Must­Grow, and how do you want in­ves­tors to think about the company’s role in the fu­ture of sus­tainable and re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve agri­cul­tu­re?

Corey Gi­as­son: The fu­ture of agri­cul­tu­re is that of sus­taina­bi­li­ty. Con­su­mers are de­man­ding a he­alt­hy, safe food sup­p­ly, and far­mers they want to pro­tect and build-up their num­ber one as­set, which is the soil. The only thing is, far­mers need to grow more food, and to do so with rest­ric­ted use of syn­the­tic chemicals/fertilizers, sus­tainable and re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve pro­ducts are go­ing to be nee­ded. To make sure they can ma­xi­mi­ze pro­duc­tion and get a ROI, they are go­ing to gra­vi­ta­te and use sus­tainable and re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve pro­ducts that work.

That is what Must­Grow is tech­no­lo­gy is all about – it’s an ef­fec­ti­ve so­lu­ti­on for sus­tainable and re­ge­ne­ra­ti­ve agri­cul­tu­re. It helps to pro­vi­de a he­alt­hy and safe food sup­p­ly so con­su­mers are hap­py. Far­mers will also be hap­py as it just as ef­fec­ti­ve as syn­the­tics, but is safe for use and is de­si­gned to pro­tect soil he­alth and the soil mi­cro­bio­me, sup­port plant he­alth, and con­tri­bu­te to glo­bal food se­cu­ri­ty th­rough more sus­tainable agri­cul­tu­ral prac­ti­ces.

The over­all macroe­co­no­mic in­vest­ment the­se is at­trac­ti­ve to in­ves­tors – an in­vest­ment in Must­Grow is an in­vest­ment in not only agri­cul­tu­re (more food will be nee­ded), but sus­tainable agri­cul­tu­re (agri­cul­tu­re is mo­ving in that di­rec­tion). In ad­di­ti­on, Must­Grow is in the midst of in­iti­al com­mer­cia­liza­ti­on with sa­les start­ing to ramp-up and a very tight cap struc­tu­re that will re­main as we don’t need to build a bil­li­on plant to get into pro­duc­tion – we’re pro­du­cing pro­duct uti­li­zing our ma­nu­fac­tu­ring part­ners. As such, with in­cre­asing sa­les and even­tual­ly po­si­ti­ve cash flows, cou­pled with a tight ca­pi­tal struc­tu­re, MustGrow’s share pri­ce could see si­gni­fi­cant app­re­cia­ti­on in the fu­ture.

GBC AG: Mr. Gi­as­son, thank you for the in­sightful dis­cus­sion and for sha­ring your per­spec­ti­ve on MustGrow’s stra­tegy and growth plans. We look for­ward to fol­lo­wing the company’s pro­gress.

You can down­load the re­se­arch here: 20260218_MustGrow_Interview_EN

Cont­act for ques­ti­ons:
GBC AG
Hal­der­stra­ße 27
86150 Augs­burg
0821241133 0
research@​gbc-​ag.​de
++++++++++++++++
Of­fen­le­gung mög­li­cher In­ter­es­sens­kon­flik­te nach § 85 WpHG und Art. 20 MAR Beim oben ana­ly­sier­ten Un­ter­neh­men ist fol­gen­der mög­li­cher In­ter­es­sen­kon­flikt ge­ge­ben: (5a,11); Ei­nen Ka­ta­log mög­li­cher In­ter­es­sen­kon­flik­te fin­den Sie un­ter: https://​www​.gbc​-ag​.de/​d​e​/​O​f​f​e​n​l​e​g​u​n​g​.​htm
+++++++++++++++
Date of Com­ple­ti­on: 18.02.2026 (9:00 am)
Date of First Dis­tri­bu­ti­on: 19.02.2026 (10:00 am)

Cont­act

Stu­dies

GBC AG
Hal­der­stra­ße 27
86150 Augs­burg

Te­le­fon: +49 821 241133–0
E‑mail: office(@)gbc-ag.de

Fol­low us!